Personal tools

Argument: NATO expansion cynically benefits US military industrial complex

From Debatepedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Parent debate

Supporting quotations

Rep. Ron Paul, MD. "Against NATO Expansion". Lew Rockwell. 2004 - It will also mean more corporate welfare at home. As we know, NATO membership demands a minimum level of military spending of its member states. For NATO’s new members, the burden of significantly increased military spending when there are no longer external threats is hard to meet. Unfortunately, this is where the US government steps in, offering aid and subsidized loans to these members so they can purchase more unneeded and unnecessary military equipment. In short, it is nothing more than corporate welfare for the US military industrial complex.

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits