Personal tools

Argument: Manned mission to Mars will stimulate the engineering industry

From Debatepedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Parent debate

Supporting quotations

Karen Auguston. "Why We Need a Mission to Mars." Design News. February 2, 2004: "A manned mission to Mars just might single-handedly salvage what's left of the engineering profession here in the U.S., where interest in anything involving second-order differential equations has been on the wane since the mid-1980s. [...] In 1961, I didn't hear John Kennedy describe to the nation how we were going to put a man on the moon. My mother had already put me down for nap. But in 1969, I—along with my brother and sister and tens of thousands of kids across America—was glued to the family television out on the back porch, watching Neil Armstrong make one big step for man. [...] What happened in space in that day in July 1969 captured the world's attention. And it inspired tens of thousands of kids just like me—and many of you, I'm guessing—to set their own goals to do well in school, go on to study engineering, and then go to work for NASA. [...] We didn't all achieve that last part, but tens of thousands of us born before 1969 worked hard, got into engineering school, and earned our degrees. Our numbers increased every year between 1976 and 1985. [...] Since then, the number of engineering degrees awarded in the U.S. has declined steadily every year, with the exception of 1995, when there was a small up-tick. Meanwhile, lawyers and MBAs are multiplying like rabbits. Experts predict that there will be a huge shortage of engineers in the coming years as the same kids who were inspired by putting a man on the moon begin leaving the field to enjoy their retirement years in Florida. [...] So just ask yourself this question: Without an aggressive goal like putting a man on Mars, just what exactly will be the inspiration for this generation of kids to pursue an education in engineering?"

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits