Personal tools

Argument: Emissions trading reduces economic costs of global warming

From Debatepedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Parent debate(s)

Evidence: the United States sulfur dioxide cap-and-trade system and its damage control:

The United States sulfure dioxide cap-and-trade system proved very economically beneficial (cost savings). According to the EPA, the benefits of the 1990 amendments exceeded implementation costs by a factor of four, with a maximum estimate of $1.4 trillion.[1]

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits